<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="http://hardrockstars.org/utility/FeedStylesheets/rss.xsl" media="screen"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"><channel><title>Jill&amp;#39;s Blog - All Comments</title><link>http://hardrockstars.org/blogs/jill/default.aspx</link><description /><dc:language>en</dc:language><generator>CommunityServer 2007 (Build: 20423.869)</generator><item><title>re: Harry Potter predictions</title><link>http://hardrockstars.org/blogs/jill/archive/2007/06/29/harry-potter-predictions.aspx#58</link><pubDate>Sun, 15 Jul 2007 23:00:03 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">56e207ff-0de8-4ecf-a297-49d6a576ef91:58</guid><dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting about Harry being a Horocrux, but it would seem to be a bit of a contradiction to the Trelawny prophecy, which says that one must die for the other to live. &amp;nbsp;But the bit with Snape suggests an out that makes it work even with the prophecy, so I'm not sure. &amp;nbsp;I agree with your bit about Neville, and in fact I've always thought Dumbledore's explanation of why it's Harry (at the end of 5) was a bit weak. &amp;nbsp;There's an obvious setup there for a Lord of the Rings-style ending. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://hardrockstars.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=58" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item><item><title>re: Rubin and Ed</title><link>http://hardrockstars.org/blogs/jill/archive/2007/05/21/rubin-and-ed.aspx#47</link><pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 19:27:20 GMT</pubDate><guid isPermaLink="false">56e207ff-0de8-4ecf-a297-49d6a576ef91:47</guid><dc:creator>Pat</dc:creator><description>&lt;p&gt;Cool, I'll have to check this one out. &amp;nbsp;:-)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img src="http://hardrockstars.org/aggbug.aspx?PostID=47" width="1" height="1"&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>